Re: [Xpert]Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
- From: Vladimir Dergachev <volodya mindspring com>
- To: Jim Gettys <jg pa dec com>
- Cc: David Brownell <david-b pacbell net>, Ryan Shaw <ryan shaw stanfordalumni org>, <linux-hotplug-devel lists sourceforge net>, <wm-spec-list gnome org>, <xpert xfree86 org>, Oliver Neukum <520047054719-0001 t-online de>
- Subject: Re: [Xpert]Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:15:34 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Jim Gettys wrote:
> Fundamentally, we have no convention right now for any client (root or not)
> to connect to an X server except on initiation of the user (unless
> the user is silly enough to disable authentication entirely.
>
> This is an generic X issue (how to delegate authorization to connect).
> There is the xauth mechanism, not very secure, but no convention on its
> use in these circumstances. There is also support for kerberos, which
> is reasonably secure when used properly. And there is SSH, which has
> never been integrated into X's world cleanly (and probably should be).
> And there is Owen's scheme for
> some sort of server process, but this presents much the same fundamental
> security/authentication/authorization problem as well.
>
> I don't have a preconcieved
> notion of what the correct solution is; I'm not even very familiar with
> the possibilities.
>
> Certainly, I want no user intervention as much of the time as possible, but
> we also need a hotplug design which allows for user intervention at the
> time of first use in cases where it may be necessary. The hotplug script
> design needs to allow for this, even if it is not the usual case.
> And there is need to automatically run GUI based programs, even after
> configuration (automatically downloading images off your camera, for
> example).
>
> Personally, I find it very frustrating to have to go looking for a configuration tool before I can use some hardware: this is not something
> a (mere mortal) user knows in advance, and so don't believe the right thing
> to do is necessarily nothing (though for much hardware this may be the correct
> answer, it isn't for most casually used hardware).
>
> We can certainly split this discussion to the different communities
> if people think that is best, but I wanted to get the problem aired;
> there is a problem for each community to mull over at the core of this
> problem.
>
> And someone who sends mail from an address "nogui" certainly has a strong
> opinion on the topic, which may not be universal :-;.
> - Jim
Jim, if the user is logged in so is the rest of the user interface. Why
not have a monitoring program (like console) that watches the hotplug
events and invokes corresponding configuration program ? This would also
allow for various user environments to customize configuration tools to
match their look.
Vladimir Dergachev
>
>
> --
> Jim Gettys
> Cambridge Research Laboratory
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> jg pa dec com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xpert mailing list
> Xpert XFree86 Org
> http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xpert
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]