Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4



On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Matthias Clasen wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: julian adams <julian adams gmx net>
> To: Matthias Clasen <Matthias Clasen poet de>; <wm-spec-list gnome org>;
> <Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us>
> Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 16:10
> Subject: Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4
> 
> 
> >
> > > With a widely-deployed implementation (KDE2) of the stuff described in
> the
> > > current spec and considering it is named 1.0pre3, I think it would be
> > unwise
> > > to change this now. But we should try to clarify what clients can expect
> > > to find out via _NET_SUPPORTED.
> > >
> > I think it's important that we take note of the KDE 2 implementation, and
> > try to avoid breaking it. I think the spec should be considered to be in
> > feature freeze really. Additions due to *really* obvious oversights such
> are
> > the icon name should be fine.
> >
> 
> Yes. In particular the question wether _NET_WORKAREA contains left, right,
> top, bottom
> border widths or a geometry (x, y, width, height) should be decided by
> looking what
> the KDE implementation does and simply codifying that.

When I implemented _NET for KDE2, I took _NET_WORKAREA as a
rect (x, y, w, h)

> Matthias
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> wm-spec-list mailing list
> wm-spec-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/wm-spec-list
> 

--
Bradley T. Hughes <bhughes trolltech com>
Trolltech AS - Waldemar Thranes gt. 98B N-0175 Oslo, Norway
Office: +47 21604892
Mobile: +47 92019781





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]