Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4
- From: "Matthias Clasen" <Matthias Clasen poet de>
- To: "julian adams" <julian adams gmx net>, <wm-spec-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4
- Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 16:19:02 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: julian adams <julian adams gmx net>
To: Matthias Clasen <Matthias Clasen poet de>; <wm-spec-list gnome org>;
<Sasha_Vasko osca state mo us>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 16:10
Subject: Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4
>
> > With a widely-deployed implementation (KDE2) of the stuff described in
the
> > current spec and considering it is named 1.0pre3, I think it would be
> unwise
> > to change this now. But we should try to clarify what clients can expect
> > to find out via _NET_SUPPORTED.
> >
> I think it's important that we take note of the KDE 2 implementation, and
> try to avoid breaking it. I think the spec should be considered to be in
> feature freeze really. Additions due to *really* obvious oversights such
are
> the icon name should be fine.
>
Yes. In particular the question wether _NET_WORKAREA contains left, right,
top, bottom
border widths or a geometry (x, y, width, height) should be decided by
looking what
the KDE implementation does and simply codifying that.
Matthias
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]