Re: Comments on 1.0pre3/pre4

["julian adams" <julian adams gmx net>]

> With a widely-deployed implementation (KDE2) of the stuff described in the
> current spec and considering it is named 1.0pre3, I think it would be
unwise
> to change this now. But we should try to clarify what clients can expect
> to find out via _NET_SUPPORTED.
>
I think it's important that we take note of the KDE 2 implementation, and
try to avoid breaking it. I think the spec should be considered to be in
feature freeze really. Additions due to *really* obvious oversights such are
the icon name should be fine.

Julian