Re: [Vala] state of the art in vala code-completion?
- From: Robert Schroll <rschroll gmail com>
- To: Nick Watts <fatalglory gmail com>
- Cc: vala-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Vala] state of the art in vala code-completion?
- Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 23:20:19 -0400
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 3:07 AM, Nick Watts <fatalglory gmail com>
wrote:
Does anyone out there know what is currently the most promising
solution
for vala code intelligence? How far along is it in terms of
features/stability?
I've been using Valencia [1] in Gedit for some time now. It provides
autocompletion, function signatures, and a few other things. What I
like most is the ability to jump to a function definition from any use.
This works both for functions in your project as well as those defined
externally. (You get the vapi file, not the C source, but I generally
prefer that.) It's extraordinarily helpful when trying to get a grip
on an unfamiliar codebase.
I haven't played with any other similar projects for vala, so I can't
offer comparisons.
Hope that helps,
Robert
[1] https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/Valencia
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]