Re: [Vala] volatile variable
- From: Nor Jaidi Tuah <norjaidi tuah ubd edu bn>
- To: <vala-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Vala] volatile variable
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 08:44:31 +0800
As a side question - why do you need volatile? In most cases it's not
needed (unless you write kernel/driver and do memory based I/O).
My multithreaded code didn't work and I thought
may be gcc is making a wrong optimization.
Turns out to be my own fault.
But still, I'm curious, can gcc make a wrong
optimization not knowing that a variable may
be changed by another thread?
I notice that both glib and vala use volatile ref_count.
So, if we were to do our own application-specific
memory management, shouldn't we have volatile
somewhere?
Nice day
Nor Jaidi Tuah
PRIVILEGED/CONFIDENTIAL information may be contained in this message. If you are neither the addressee
(intended recipient) nor an authorised recipient of the addressee, and have received this message in error,
please destroy this message (including attachments) and notify the sender immediately. STRICT PROHIBITION:
This message, whether in part or in whole, should not be reviewed, retained, copied, reused, disclosed,
distributed or used for any purpose whatsoever. Such unauthorised use may be unlawful and may contain
material protected by the Official Secrets Act (Cap 153) of the Laws of Brunei Darussalam. DISCLAIMER:
We/This Department/The Government of Brunei Darussalam, accept[s] no responsibility for loss or damage
arising from the use of this message in any manner whatsoever. Our messages are checked for viruses but we do
not accept liability for any viruses which may be transmitted in or with this message.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]