Re: [Vala] memory management with structs (OT a bit)

[Donn <donn ingle gmail com>]

On 18/05/2013 13:40, Jonas Kulla wrote:
> no, compact classes are even simpler than non-Gobject classes. The
> latter still have reference count and can be extended, whereas
> compact classes are mostly "classified" structs without ref count
> which also cannot be extended in subclasses.
Okay, but did that answer the question? I'm not sure.

It was:
> > You can use classes that don't inherit from GObject, which are
> > lighter.
Are such classes the:
A) [Compact] classes
or
B) is any class that does not specify a parent class automatically a
"light" class?

i.e. How do you create a class that does *not* inherit from GObject?

\d