Re: [Vala] Multiple Namespace problem

[Alexandre Rosenfeld <alexandre rosenfeld gmail com>]

I believe the problem you have there is that you have nested namespaces and
there was a discussion sometime ago which said that GIR doesn't support it,
although I don't know if specifying the gir namespace should avoid it.
At that discussion (it's "Support for custom attribute
introspection/reflection?" if you want to search for it) they pointed to
this bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576327

I believe that is your issue, but I'm no expert, I just found your problem
familiar.

Regards

On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 23:09, Daniel Espinosa <esodan gmail com> wrote:

> I'm seeing at GXml project (http://git.gnome.org/browse/gxml), and I
> found that it uses two Namespaces to define its classes. But GXml
> namespace don't have any class defined (yet), I suppose will be used
> to define new modules after DOM is finished (may be XSD or others).
> But when I try to generate GIR and typelib files, it tries to include
> GXml module from outside (and doesn't exists of course) and Dom is
> located inside GXml namespace. The next example generate a GIR file
> but refuse to create typelib because GXml include fails.
>
> Is this the expected behavior or what is the better to do on Multiple
> and incomplete namespaces?
>
>
> This is an example:
>
> [CCode (gir_namespace="GXml", gir_version="1.0")]
> namespace GXml {
>    [CCode (gir_namespace="GXml", gir_version="1.0")]
>    namespace Dom {
>        public class Node : GLib.Object {
>            public void foo() {
>                stdout.printf("Node.foo()\n");
>            }
>        }
>
>        public class Attr : Node {
>            public new void foo () {
>                stdout.printf("Attr.foo()");
>            }
>        }
>    }
> }
> _______________________________________________
> vala-list mailing list
> vala-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list