Re: [Vala] Abstract properties in Concrete Class

[pancake <pancake youterm com>]

Offtopic: why don't you use?

print (test.to_string());

On Jun 10, 2010, at 9:08 AM, Luca Bruno <lethalman88 gmail com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:25:37PM -0400, tecywiz121 wrote:
> > Hello again,
> >
> > This is the second snippet I was curious about.
> >
> > Basically, valac should not allow the following code to compile since
> > IMHO, its completely wrong.
> >
> > Just checking whether I should file a bug report or not.
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > public class TestClass
> > {
> >    public abstract bool test_prop { get; set; }
> > }
> >
> > public static int main(string[] args)
> > {
> >    TestClass tc = new TestClass();
> >
> >    bool test = tc.test_prop;
> >
> >    stdout.printf("%s\n", test ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
> >    return 0;
> > }
>
> Given class TestSubclass : TestClass overriding test_prop:
>
> TestClass tc = new TestSubclass();
> bool test = tc.test_prop;
>
> It's completely right.
>
> You might want to make TestClass an abstract class to not  
> instantiate it,
> but problems come on runtime and it's not a compiler failure if you  
> don't
> override the property.
>
> --
> http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
> _______________________________________________
> vala-list mailing list
> vala-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list