On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 10:25:37PM -0400, tecywiz121 wrote:
Hello again,
This is the second snippet I was curious about.
Basically, valac should not allow the following code to compile since
IMHO, its completely wrong.
Just checking whether I should file a bug report or not.
------------------------------------
public class TestClass
{
public abstract bool test_prop { get; set; }
}
public static int main(string[] args)
{
TestClass tc = new TestClass();
bool test = tc.test_prop;
stdout.printf("%s\n", test ? "TRUE" : "FALSE");
return 0;
}
Given class TestSubclass : TestClass overriding test_prop: TestClass tc = new TestSubclass(); bool test = tc.test_prop; It's completely right. You might want to make TestClass an abstract class to not instantiate it, but problems come on runtime and it's not a compiler failure if you don't override the property. -- http://www.debian.org - The Universal Operating System
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature