Re: [Vala] Libxml2 being nicer?
- From: Joseph Montanez <jmontanez gorilla3d com>
- To: Travis Watkins <amaranth ubuntu com>
- Cc: vala-list gnome org, jreidthompson nc rr com
- Subject: Re: [Vala] Libxml2 being nicer?
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:43:41 -0800
Sounds painful, so I know the libxml2 is already partially bound but I
am not sure where the bind file is. If anyone could point me in the
right direction I would certainly like to try to complete the binding.
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Travis Watkins <amaranth ubuntu com> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Joseph Montanez
<jmontanez gorilla3d com> wrote:
Hm.. I think that would work but I've been following
http://references.valadoc.org/libxml-2.0.html So i guess the bindings
for the html parse of libxml isn't there yet. I tried to follow
http://live.gnome.org/Vala/Bindings to bind libxml2 but after making
the .files and .namespace there wasn't much luck running with the
vala-gen-introspect. It just hangs doing nothing.
You have to do the libxml2 bindings by hand (like they are done now)
because libxml2 does not use GObject or (imo) a sane or consistent
naming scheme so you have to manually map it.
Design, Develop, Deploy
] [Thread Prev