Re: [Vala] Libgee's Roadmap proposal

[Levi Bard <taktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktaktak gmail com>]

> > > Could you fit in making Map interface a Collection? It is technically
> > > a collection of key-value pairs, and I see no reason why the interface
> > > shouldn't reflect it. :)
> >
> > Yeah. I agree on that, hence my question in the first mail about
> > exposing an interface for map entries (that key/value pairs).
>
> How is that possible, the methods' signatures do not match:
>  - Collection.add (G item) vs. Map.set (K key, V value)
>  - Collection.contains (G item) vs. Map.contains (K key)
>  - Collection.remove (K item) vs. Map.remove (K key)

Why not rename some of the Map methods (contains => contains_key,
remove => remove_key) and then map the Collection methods as-is with G
== Pair<K,V>?