Re: [Vala] static abstract member functions?

[Yu Feng <rainwoodman gmail com>]

On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 00:47 +0200, Vlad Grecescu wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:38 PM, Yu Feng <rainwoodman gmail com>
> wrote:
>         Hi,
>         
>         I am curious but are there any reasons to avoid static
>         abstract member
>         functions? They seem to be pretty doable because the class
>         structure is
>         instance-independent.
>         
>         Regards,
>         
>         Yu
>
> Doesn't 'abstract' implies
> not-implemented-here-please-rely-on-Polymorphism?
>
> I suppose this has yet to be done without instances .
GObject->constructor is similar to this. It is virtual and static.



> --
> Vlad