Re: [Vala] Action signals
- From: Yu Feng <rainwoodman gmail com>
- To: gege2061 <gege2061 redaction-developpez com>
- Cc: vala <vala-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Vala] Action signals
- Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 01:49:31 -0400
Hi,
I was working on a related patch
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571685
Although 'action' keyword is not included in the patch.
What's the difference between an action signal and other signals?
Yu
On Sun, 2009-04-05 at 20:15 +0200, gege2061 wrote:
This doesn't work.
I have tested with the action keyword, but I have a syntax error and
the CCode attribute seems to not work.
My code:
public class Test
{
[CCode (action_signal = true)]
public action void test_action ();
}
2009/1/6 Yu Feng <rainwoodman gmail com>
Based on my understanding of valac before the recent
refactoring, it
should be a few line patch around 'signal binding' related
code;
get a new CCode attribute such as 'action_signal = true' and
change the
type of the signal to ACTION if so.
Yu
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:04 +0100, gege2061 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Have you fixed this problem:
>
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/vala-list/2008-April/msg00076.html ?
>
> --
> Nicolas Joseph
>
> Responsable de la rubrique GTK+ de developpez.com /
> In charge of the GTK+ section on developpez.com
>
> http://nicolasj.developpez.com
> _______________________________________________
> Vala-list mailing list
> Vala-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/vala-list
--
Nicolas Joseph
Responsable des rubriques C et GTK+ de developpez.com /
In charge of the C and GTK+ sections on developpez.com
http://nicolasj.developpez.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]