Re: [Vala] Plugable Code Generators

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Andrea Del Signore <sejerpz gmail com>wrote:

> can you elaborate a little why the transform branch should be merged
> before?
> What's its purpose?
> Anyway we are talking about experimental stuff and we shouldn't be
> worried about compatibility and such, so why not include a simple
> patch like mine and after go for the full solution?

I don't think you're able to resurrect posix and dova with only that patch
plus a plugin, am I wrong?
The point behind the transform branch is to transform the code tree and not
write codegen backends. Thus plugins will be visitors that transform the
code tree, not that add new inconsistent codegen backends.

-- - The Universal Operating System

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]