Re: [Usability] Application matching in GNOME 3

From: Alex Launi <alexlauni gnome org>
To: Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com>
Cc: Allan Caeg <allancaeg ubuntu com>, Gnome Usability <usability gnome org>, GNOME Shell Mailing List <gnome-shell-list gnome org>
Subject: Re: [Usability] Application matching in GNOME 3
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 12:07:10 -0500

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam redhat com> wrote:

As some of you may know, there's a bit of an issue with bamf, which is
that it requires a change to glib2 that, so far, upstream will not
accept. I'm trying to help resolve that (in, erm, diplomatic terms, not
code terms) at present but it's not super easy.

Is there a bug report/mailing list thread where this political discussion is happening? What exactly is the issue?

--
-- Alex Launi

References:
- [Usability] Taking Advantage of Spatial Memory with the GS Window Picker
  - From: Allan Caeg
- Re: [Usability] Taking Advantage of Spatial Memory with the GS Window Picker
  - From: Andreas Wallberg
- Re: [Usability] Taking Advantage of Spatial Memory with the GS Window Picker
  - From: Allan Caeg
- Re: [Usability] Taking Advantage of Spatial Memory with the GS Window Picker
  - From: Milan Bouchet-Valat
- Re: [Usability] Taking Advantage of Spatial Memory with the GS Window Picker
  - From: Alex Launi
- Re: [Usability] Taking Advantage of Spatial Memory with the GS Window Picker
  - From: Milan Bouchet-Valat
- [Usability] Application matching in GNOME 3
  - From: Adam Williamson

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]