Re: [Usability] Category Management (i.e. Rhythmbox Music Player)
- From: Jacob Beauregard <jake13jake comcast net>
- To: "usability gnome org" <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Category Management (i.e. Rhythmbox Music Player)
- Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:10:12 -0400
I thought I had differentiated searching vs. browsing, but I'll give it
another go:
Think of the different reasons you'd use an aggregator (del.icio.us,
digg, reddit, slashdot aggregators) as opposed to using a search engine
(google, yahoo, live searches).
In essence, searching is active, requiring direct input from the user.
Meanwhile, browsing is passive, requiring no direct input from the user.
Each one takes a different mindset because searching has a narrow focus
and browsing has a contextual focus. As a result, they are very
different experiences.
Here's a brief article that notes some differences.
http://powazek.com/2005/01/000484.html
What I'm trying to get at is that both are useful, but they don't have
the same reasons for being useful (i.e. search capabilities do not void
the need for browsing capabilities).
Kirk Bridger wrote:
There is obviously a lot of thought behind these comments, but I
really am confused as to what the actual use case here is. What does
the user want to do that searching doesn't accomplish?
Sorry to appear so daft, but it feels like I would like to contribute
but am just not grasping what the problem and use case are.
Kirk
_______________________________________________
Usability mailing list
Usability gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]