Re: [Usability] Using Control-Esc and Windows keys to access the start menu
- From: Lennart Borgman <lennart borgman 073 student lu se>
- To: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- Cc: Usability gnome org, Mathias Dahl <mathias dahl gmail com>
- Subject: Re: [Usability] Using Control-Esc and Windows keys to access the start menu
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:48:12 +0200
Calum Benson wrote:
On 22 Aug 2006, at 19:26, Mathias Dahl wrote:
Lennart Borgman <lennart borgman 073 student lu se> writes:
I currently use MS Windows. No big surprise I guess, that is what
the majority of computer users do today. I am kind of fanatic about
keyboard usage.
Me too. And I have to say that in this area, Windows really shines
(just for the record, I am a GNU/Linux + Gnome user and a quite vivid
MS-critic). If I could get the same consistency under Gnome, it would
be really nice.
I'm pretty confident that GNOME actually has wider and more
consistent keyboard coverage than Windows-- e.g. try moving splitter
bars on Windows and see how far you get :) We tabulated all the
keyboard behaviour of various desktops (including Windows) before we
started, and designed GNOME's 2.x keyboard from the ground up with
that information to hand.
Thanks for your answer Calum. Since you say that GNOME's 2.x keyboard
was redesigned with the various desktops in mind and since Windows is by
far the biggest competitor (and the one we really want to take users
from) why was such things as I mentioned, and that are so important and
familiar to many MS Windows users, why are those left out?
Can you please explain the reasoning? Since there was a redesign I can
not understand the arguments about internal consistency.
Please file bugs (with the keynav keyword) about any inconsistencies
or holes you find in GNOME's keyboard navigability. (Note that "not
the way Windows does it" doesn't necessarily mean it's inconsistent;
internal consistency is generally more important here, especially
from an accessibility viewpoint.)
Exactly what do you want me to do?
Cheeri,
Calum.
Kind regards,
L
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]