Le Mercredi 14 Décembre 2005 10:07, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > Le mardi 13 décembre 2005 à 02:33 +0100, Till Kamppeter a écrit : > > Frederic told that the options from the PPD file are intentionally mot > > listed in the printing dialog, the usability team of GNOME was against > > listing these options. They clutter the dialog and can be more confusing > > than useful to the user. > > I'm just going to correct some things Till wrote that I would have said. > It seems either I didn't explained correctly, or Till misunderstood my > explanations (or probably a little of both) on what was the current > state of printing on GNOME and why full PPD options were not in GNOME > yet and why they probably would not go in it by just a snap of a finger > but only after careful interface reviewing. Thus the original message > was sent by Till on GNOME usability mailing list, to try to discuss how > to improve GNOME printing UI. Thanks for confirming that 'the options from the PPD file are "not" intentionally not listed in the printing dialog, the usability team of GNOME was "not" against listing these options. They "do not" clutter the dialog and can be more confusing than useful to the user.' Because as is, without theese ppd options, it "realy is" very confusing and unuseful for the user to need at least 3 printqueues of the same printer for the printer to work properly: http://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20224 -- Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis Mandriva QA Team
Attachment:
pgp1pDZh0nkFV.pgp
Description: PGP signature