Re: [Usability]GNOME main menu and panel
- From: Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>
- To: Alan Horkan <horkana maths tcd ie>
- Cc: Dave Bordoley <bordoley msu edu>, Jeroen Verhoeckx <jeroenverh2002 yahoo com>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]GNOME main menu and panel
- Date: 17 Jan 2003 02:01:23 -0800
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 09:15, Alan Horkan wrote:
>
> 2 Panels?
>
> > Of course If i had it my way we would rip off the mac and put the menus
> > at the top of the screen, but that just isn't in the cards. Sorry for
>
> gtk 1.x had panel at the bottom.
> getting rid of it would have annoyed people like me.
>
> other people think it is a better idea to have the panel at the top.
>
> I strongly suspect (but i am only guessing) that having the two panels
> was a less than ideal
> compromise.
> It has the advantage of showing users what is available, although I
> suspect most users pretty quickly turn one of them off.
Thus far my 6-month after surveys (6 mo. after having a GNOME desktop,
"switching" (usually complementing, actually) from Windows or MacOS) are
showing most people sticking with the two panel layout. Not a big pool
of people right now (5), but thinking of most of the people I know,
probably more than half of them use a two panel layout.
As far as a more theoretic defense...
1) The space is fairly minimal on a system with equal to or more than
1024x768
2) It gives a lot of room to the window list, which is particularly nice
for people who don't use workspaces (which many of these people are
not). I have noticed Windows users often get very cramped, and sometimes
shut applications just to get more space.
3) It provides a nice conceptual separation between window management
tasks, and "other things". But this point's mostly just us wanking off
:-)
-Seth
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]