Re: [Usability]List policy, usability leadership, mission statement [Was: "widget"]
- From: Pat Costello <Patrick Costello Sun COM>
- To: jdub perkypants org, hp redhat com
- Cc: usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]List policy, usability leadership, mission statement [Was: "widget"]
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:07:16 +0100 (BST)
Havoc,
You don't mention "changes to the UI" as a concrete task, is that on purpose or
an oversight?
Pat
> Delivered-To: usability gnome org
> X-Authentication-Warning: icon.devel.redhat.com: hp set sender to
hp redhat com using -f
> To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
> Cc: usability gnome org
> Subject: Re: [Usability]List policy, usability leadership, mission statement
[Was: "widget"]
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-BeenThere: usability gnome org
> X-Loop: usability gnome org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
> List-Help: <mailto:usability-request gnome org?subject=help>
> List-Post: <mailto:usability gnome org>
> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability>,
<mailto:usability-request gnome org?subject=subscribe>
> List-Id: This list is devoted to discussing and improving GNOME's usability
<usability.gnome.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability>,
<mailto:usability-request gnome org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The way to organize the usability effort IMO is to focus on concrete
> tasks. Which usability@ has been a lot better at than past gnome UI
> efforts, and why we made a lot of progress in GNOME 2.
>
> The concrete tasks probably include:
>
> - changes to the HIG; there has to be a process for this, and a clear
> maintainer or team who can and does make decisions
>
> - UI review for HIG compliance, resulting in filing bugzilla reports
>
> - user testing
>
> - reviewing prior art and/or studies and posting results
>
> Long threads arguing the merits of XYZ in the abstract, or where
> everyone posts their vote on what they personally use, are just not
> useful. I don't think those threads will ever go away, they're a fact
> of life, and honestly they are fairly harmless. The important issue is
> whether the concrete tasks are getting done, which hinges on good
> leadership and good process.
>
> If we can make UI decisions (instead of punting and making it
> configurable or whatever), and can communicate those decisions (by
> documenting them in HIG and bugzilla), then we have something that
> works.
>
> Havoc
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]