Re: [Usability]List policy, usability leadership, mission statement [Was: "widget"]



Havoc, 

You don't mention "changes to the UI" as a concrete task, is that on purpose or 
an oversight? 

Pat

> Delivered-To: usability gnome org
> X-Authentication-Warning: icon.devel.redhat.com: hp set sender to 
hp redhat com using -f
> To: Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>
> Cc: usability gnome org
> Subject: Re: [Usability]List policy, usability leadership, mission statement 
[Was: "widget"]
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> X-BeenThere: usability gnome org
> X-Loop: usability gnome org
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8
> List-Help: <mailto:usability-request gnome org?subject=help>
> List-Post: <mailto:usability gnome org>
> List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability>, 
<mailto:usability-request gnome org?subject=subscribe>
> List-Id: This list is devoted to discussing and improving GNOME's usability 
<usability.gnome.org>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability>, 
<mailto:usability-request gnome org?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://mail.gnome.org/archives/usability/>
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The way to organize the usability effort IMO is to focus on concrete
> tasks. Which usability@ has been a lot better at than past gnome UI
> efforts, and why we made a lot of progress in GNOME 2.
> 
> The concrete tasks probably include:
> 
>  - changes to the HIG; there has to be a process for this, and a clear
>    maintainer or team who can and does make decisions
> 
>  - UI review for HIG compliance, resulting in filing bugzilla reports
> 
>  - user testing
> 
>  - reviewing prior art and/or studies and posting results
> 
> Long threads arguing the merits of XYZ in the abstract, or where
> everyone posts their vote on what they personally use, are just not
> useful. I don't think those threads will ever go away, they're a fact
> of life, and honestly they are fairly harmless. The important issue is
> whether the concrete tasks are getting done, which hinges on good
> leadership and good process.
> 
> If we can make UI decisions (instead of punting and making it
> configurable or whatever), and can communicate those decisions (by
> documenting them in HIG and bugzilla), then we have something that
> works.
> 
> Havoc
> _______________________________________________
> Usability mailing list
> Usability gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/usability




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]