Re: [Usability]No HIG maintainer?
- From: murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)
- To: merchan phys lsu edu
- Cc: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>, "usability gnome org" <usability gnome org>, hig gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Usability]No HIG maintainer?
- Date: 11 Dec 2002 00:09:49 +0100
On Wed, 2002-12-11 at 00:32, Gregory Merchan wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 10:56:38AM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:09:46PM +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > Shouldn't we just tell them to use the default, then later change the
> > > default in GTK+?
> <snip>
> > FWIW I'm not sure you will convince Owen to change the GtkFrame
> > defaults (and I think he'll have a good argument), because it's an
> > incompatible change. However what you might convince him to do is to
> > make the defaults some kind of theme property. But I'm just
> > speculating here, maybe he'll change it.
>
> I wouldn't change the defaults. Surely there are still good uses for
> a normal weight, etched-in frame.
Changing the defaults does not suggest removing the ability to use
something other than the defaults.
--
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]