Re: [Usability]No HIG maintainer?

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 18:54, Calum Benson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-09 at 16:48, Murray Cumming wrote:
> 
> > To clarify: I'm trying to get a response. Any response. I would escalate
> > this to gnome-hackers before actually trying to hijack anything.
> 
> I'm as active as anyone, and I never delete a HIG email without replying
> to it if possible... unfortunately, as a result of trying to fix things
> for Sun's looming code freeze, I've currently accumulated about 100
> unreplied-to HIG emails and bug reports in my inbox :/  Hopefully this
> will ease in the run-up to Christmas and I'll have more time to
> review/work on it again.

If you don't have time then you should try to delegate. That seems
obvious. I'm trying to triage the bugs at the moment, but I don't have
the authority to really resolve anything.

At the moment I'm concerned that we have GNOME 2.2 ui-review bugs
telling people to do all the bizarre bizarre border and frame
implementation stuff that's in the HIG. That obviously shouldn't happen
and it would be simpler if we took that out of the HIG. Then everything
will just become compliant when the GTK+ defaults are fixed for 2.4.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com