Re: [Usability]File renaming/extensions
- From: Daniel Borgmann <daniel liebesgedichte net>
- To: David Lazaro <david lazaro eresmas net>
- Cc: GNOME usability mailing list <usability gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Usability]File renaming/extensions
- Date: 20 Aug 2002 15:00:36 +0200
On Tue, 2002-08-20 at 11:55, David Lazaro wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> That you are right about this being slightly wasteful. What about hiding
> extensions (like everybody else, I must add)?
No, please not. ;)
Seriously, I thought about this but decided not to suggest it for
several reasons.
One of them was, that I remembered that I always disabled it in Windows
so if I would disable it, it would not solve the problem for me. :) Of
course it could be combined with another solution, but so much trouble
and coding and crack for what?
As someone already said, file extensions aren't really a Unix thing
anyway, we don't have silly .exe files for example. File extensions are
mostly informative. If you see a piece of paper icon, would you
immediately know weither that's a plaintext file or a word processor
file? File endings help to quickly gather information about the file,
but they aren't really required luckily. For example I could call my
textfile mynotes.bak just to remind my self that it's a backup. Not
because I have to. Cutting the ending wouldn't help at all, it would
just take this possibility away for me.
Oh and about the "extensions are a thing of the past" thing, I would
agree with that but that's exactly why we don't need to hide them. :) If
they aren't neccessarily used to determine the filetype anymore, there
is no reason to hide them as they are simply part of the name now.
And I really think that just selecting the filename initially would
solve the problem quite nicely. It's less prone to bugs and errors and
nobody will shoot you for it. ;)
Or does anyone disagree? If not, I will file a bugreport for it.
- Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]