Re: Comments on dialog proposal
- From: Adam Elman <aelman users sourceforge net>
- To: banthafodder connectfree co uk
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>, Christian Rose <menthos menthos com>, usability gnome org
- Subject: Re: Comments on dialog proposal
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:05:04 -0700
At 7:55 PM +0100 9/5/01, Michael Rogers wrote:
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I really think "OK" ought to be reserved for cases where the button
actually does something in addition to closing the dialog.
Fair enough. But 'Close' is uninformative. How about something that
indicates that you accept the current settings, eg 'Accept' or 'Done'?
Again, "Accept" implies that the settings are not actually set until
the button is clicked, which is wrong.
"Done" is less of a problem, but I return to my original objection to
"Done" by noting that it has absolutely no information about what's
going to happen when the button is clicked. "Close" is a specific
verb which indicates a specific action: closing the window. I think
that's probably why Apple picked it, although I don't know that for
certain.
I don't see why Close is any more confusing than "OK" or "Accept" or
"Done", really.
Adam
--
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]