> 3) Moving the ontologies to their own repo still looks like a good
> idea, because there have been some tries to run tracker with custom
> ontologies. A different repo makes it clear that the ontology is
> not "hardcoded" in the store and can be customized "downstream".
Yes. I think we need to lead and allow certain extensions and changes.
Perhaps we should start with what Baloo and Nepomuk do agree on and
gradually grow it as industries and use-cases join?