Re: [Tracker] REVIEW: Xavier Claessens' "priority" branch

[Martyn Russell <martyn lanedo com>]

On 19/02/14 13:46, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi guys,
>
> One general question I have is that if this is configuration per RDF
> class (rdf:type), then why aren't we putting this in SPARQL by just
> adding a tracker:priority boolean to the ontology of rdfs:Class?
>
> So basically, just like tracker:notify.
>
> And if not in the ontology, then why not in the .rule files?

I agree with Philip here, I think the rules files are the best place 
personally. But then what about priority contradictions, etc?

In the ontology doesn't make much sense logically because this is a 
mechanic of the extraction not the way the data is used in queries, etc.

Thanks for the idea Philip.
Carlos, Xavier, can we put priority in the rules files?

--
Regards,
Martyn

Founder & Director @ Lanedo GmbH.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martynrussell