Re: [Tracker] REVIEW: Xavier Claessens' "priority" branch
- From: Martyn Russell <martyn lanedo com>
- To: Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be>
- Cc: Xavier Claessens <xclaesse gmail com>, tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] REVIEW: Xavier Claessens' "priority" branch
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 15:56:01 +0000
On 19/02/14 13:46, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi guys,
One general question I have is that if this is configuration per RDF
class (rdf:type), then why aren't we putting this in SPARQL by just
adding a tracker:priority boolean to the ontology of rdfs:Class?
So basically, just like tracker:notify.
And if not in the ontology, then why not in the .rule files?
I agree with Philip here, I think the rules files are the best place
personally. But then what about priority contradictions, etc?
In the ontology doesn't make much sense logically because this is a
mechanic of the extraction not the way the data is used in queries, etc.
Thanks for the idea Philip.
Carlos, Xavier, can we put priority in the rules files?
--
Regards,
Martyn
Founder & Director @ Lanedo GmbH.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/martynrussell
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]