Re: [Tracker] Clues regarding improving performance of tracker-store

[Martyn Russell <martyn lanedo com>]

On 15/07/13 08:08, Jonatan Pålsson wrote:
> On 12 July 2013 18:52, Ivan Frade <ivan frade gmail com> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> >   If you are not using email, that ontology will be translated into some
> > tables in the database but they are never touched. It should not make big
> > difference.
> > >
> Aha, this is very good to know. It should mean I can keep several
> flattened ontologies side-by-side them impacting each other
> negatively. This is good!

Generally speaking, you want to aim for the least changes as possible to 
achieve what you want. That way you keep closer to upstream and have 
less maintenance burden.

What's not clear to me is your targets or if you're looking for 
optimisations out of curiosity.

What do you want to improve, query or insert times? Disk or memory 
usage, etc. etc. The list goes on. It's all possible, but you sacrifice 
something else when you do this.

--
Regards,
Martyn

Founder and CEO of Lanedo GmbH.