Re: [Tracker] Zeitgeist ontology and Tracker

[Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <mikkel kamstrup gmail com>]

On 23 March 2011 10:28, Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 10:15 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> > On 23 March 2011 00:12, Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be> wrote:
> > > o. zg:hasSubject: must be nie:InformationElement as range
> >
> > Hmmm, right. Seems to make sense, although I think the reason it is
> > like this is because some of the items in the Nepomuk ontologies are
> > not always subclasses of nie:InformationElement, and we wanted to
> > accomodate that. I can't recall the details off hand.
>
> Sound strange to me that you could have an event about something that
> isn't a nie:InformationElement. Perhaps events about a nao:Tag?

Good call. I think nao:Tag was one of the reasons here in fact.

It's not a huge deal - although we'd need a Tag class that was a
nie:InformationElement if we ever wanted to log usage of tags, but
we're not doing that now so that's hypothetical at this moment.

-- 
Cheers,
Mikkel