Re: [Tracker] Zeitgeist ontology and Tracker

[Philip Van Hoof <philip codeminded be>]

On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:21 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 22/03/11 23:12, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 21:15 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:

> > o. zg:timestamp rdfs:range xsd:long: xsd:integer is int64 in Tracker, I
> >     think we don't even support xsd:long as type atm
> >
> > o. zg:hasSubject: must be nie:InformationElement as range
>
> Philip, we already have nie:subject, doesn't it make more sense for the 
> Zg team to just filter based on the existence of nie:subject instead of 
> having a boolean to check that?

nie:subject is a xsd:string, not a nie:InformationElement. I think that
nie:subject also has a different meaning than neo:hasSubject.

I guess that neo:hasSubject is about what the event is about. Whereas
nie:subject is a string like nie:title.

Cheers,

Philip


-- 


Philip Van Hoof
freelance software developer
Codeminded BVBA - http://codeminded.be