Re: [Tracker] Zeitgeist ontology and Tracker

[Martyn Russell <martyn lanedo com>]

On 22/03/11 20:15, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Mikkel,

> There's been some back and forth about Zeitgeist/Tracker integration.
> The key point in getting anything started in this direction is
> figuring out the ontology business.

Thanks for writing this email and sorry it has taken me a while to respond.

> There has already been some work towards a solution[1]. We've already
> fixed a few issues reported by Rob a while back, but the changes in
> [1] were never discussed (see original ZG ontology in [2]). The
> problem is that Rob's work contains some changes that are incompatible
> with the original ontology, so it's not something we can adopt without
> justifying it (will break our API and bring some troublesome data
> migration work).
>
> So, let's get that discussion we never had :-) If we *theoretically*
> proposed the ZG ontology (as in [2], not [1]) for inclusion in
> Tracker, what issues would you see?

I think Philip has raised some good points.
Where do we currently stand with all this?

--
Regards,
Martyn