Re: [Tracker] ANNOUNCE: tracker 0.7.28 released

[Martyn Russell <martyn lanedo com>]

On 28/03/10 15:29, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2010/3/25 Martyn Russell<martyn lanedo com>:
> >   This release is considered a Release Candidate for 0.8. Assuming no
> >   major regressions are found with it, the next release is likely to
> >   be 0.8.0.
>
> I checked the current state of git master again, and compared which
> symbols are exported and what is exported in the public API.
> For libtracker-client and libtracker-extract it looks fine, for
> libtracker-miner I found the following symbols which are exported but
> not defined in the headers that are installed.
>
> tracker_accumulator_check_file
> tracker_marshal_BOOLEAN__OBJECT
> tracker_marshal_BOOLEAN__OBJECT_OBJECT
> tracker_marshal_BOOLEAN__OBJECT_OBJECT_OBJECT
> tracker_marshal_BOOLEAN__OBJECT_POINTER
> tracker_marshal_VOID__DOUBLE_UINT_UINT_UINT_UINT
> tracker_marshal_VOID__OBJECT_BOOLEAN
> tracker_marshal_VOID__OBJECT_OBJECT_BOOLEAN_BOOLEAN
> tracker_marshal_VOID__OBJECT_POINTER_UINT_UINT_UINT_UINT
> tracker_marshal_VOID__STRING_DOUBLE
> tracker_marshal_VOID__STRING_STRING
> tracker_marshal_VOID__STRING_STRING_BOOLEAN_BOOLEAN
> tracker_marshal_VOID__STRING_STRING_DOUBLE
> tracker_miner_dbus_add_name_watch
> tracker_miner_dbus_init
> tracker_miner_dbus_shutdown
> tracker_miner_web_dbus_associate
> tracker_miner_web_dbus_authenticate
> tracker_miner_web_dbus_dissociate
> tracker_miner_web_dbus_get_association_data
> tracker_monitor_add
> tracker_monitor_get_cache_timeout
> tracker_monitor_get_count
> tracker_monitor_get_enabled
> tracker_monitor_get_ignored
> tracker_monitor_get_scan_timeout
> tracker_monitor_get_type
> tracker_monitor_is_watched
> tracker_monitor_is_watched_by_string
> tracker_monitor_new
> tracker_monitor_remove
> tracker_monitor_remove_recursively
> tracker_monitor_set_cache_timeout
> tracker_monitor_set_enabled
> tracker_monitor_set_scan_timeout
> tracker_password_provider_gnome_get_type
>
> Imo something that should be fixed before 0.8.

I have reverted my change here, I did some checking too, the original 
regex should cover everything we need here.

This should be fixed.

--
Regards,
Martyn