Re: [Tracker] nikon project

[Alexey Fisher <bug-track fisher-privat net>]

Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 22:59 +0200 schrieb Ivan Frade:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Roberto -MadBob- Guido
> <bob4mail gmail com> wrote:
>         2010/3/21 Laurent Aguerreche <laurent aguerreche free fr>:
>         > Does somebody plan to add such features in Tracker (for
>         pictures first
>         > but they may be extended to videos for automatic
>         identification of
>         > chapters/scenes)?
>         >
>         
>         It depends on the availability of existing open licensed code
>         to
>         provide face/things recognization, since it doesn't seems a
>         function
>         implementable in short time from scratch.
>         Any link?
>
> I'd say that that functionality should be out of tracker. Applications
> should do all that "guessing" and store in tracker only facts. I think
> it is extremely difficult to do it (right) at extraction time. Anyway,
> if somebody decides to try that patch and implement an extractor for
> face recognition... it is more than welcome.
>
> I'd prefer a plugin in EOG (or any other image viewer) that allows the
> user to easily mark "My contact X is in this picture": more reliable
> information, and probably easier to implement.
>
>
>         
>         > Would Tracker be able to store appropriate data to
>         > find someone/something in a picture when this picture has
>         been proceeded
>         > to extract its content?
>         >
>         
>         This is an argument actually discussed in the Nepomuk
>         ontologies
>         bugtracker: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/oscaf/ticket/66
>         
>
> Right now it is possible with the generic nie:related property (IIRC).
> The idea is to add more specific subproperties to refine the meaning,
> but we need the concrete use cases (contact is picture is a very good
> one).
>
> Thanks for the comments, going back to the original topic, to get some
> extra information from the DCIM file system sounds a good idea (it is
> a standard, so we can kinda rely on it). I'd like to read the document
> posted before (permission already requested!)
> Regards,

Sorry, i send wrong link:
http://docs.google.com/View?id=d57752n_27ddtp6qzj
this should work better.

one more page i work with gstreamer teem:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=d57752n_32f7pb3kdm

Alexey