|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 El 18/08/09 12:29, Maciej Piechotka escribió: > On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:24 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote: >>> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure >>>> the core developers and others interested had an opinion on >>>> GNOME module inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread >>>> here: >>>> >>>> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2009-August/msg00007.html >>>> >>>> >>>> The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new >>>> GNOME module. >>>> >>>> Right now Tracker 0.7 is currently in development and we are >>>> hoping to get the 0.7. unstable release out the door in the >>>> coming month or so. >>>> >>>> Right now we are considering making the miners (the file >>>> system crawling at this point) optional so it acts purely as >>>> a store if needed by ISVs. This is not yet done in master but >>>> can be if that's a GNOME requirement. >>>> >>>> Dependencies include: >>>> >>>> libxml >= 0.6 libpng >= 1.2 libuuid zlib dbus >= 0.60 sqlite3 >>>> >= 3.5 (built with --enable-load-extension) hal >= 0.5 vala >>>> >= 0.7.3 pango >= 1.0.0 >>>> >>>> Beyond that, the rest of the requirements affect your >>>> extraction ability. For example, if poppler-glib is on the >>>> platform, you can then extract PDF files. This also depends >>>> on if streamanalyser is used or not (which does all >>>> extraction for us and negates the needs for specific >>>> libraries in Tracker). >>>> >>>> Dependencies about to be dropped but still needed: >>>> >>>> gmime lex yacc libraptor >>>> >>>> The git repository is here: >>>> >>>> http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/ >>>> >>>> We import the following libraries: >>>> >>>> libinotify rasqal >>>> >>>> Licensing wise, those libinotify and rasqal both share the >>>> LGPL, as does libtracker. The rest is GPLv2 or later. >>>> >>>> /discuss ;) >>>> >>> >>> Well. Currently there are two projects which, at least for the >>> first sight, are similar - Tracker and Beagle. So the first >>> question is why should Gnome include Tracker and not Beagle? >>> >> I might be wrong and things might have changed, but isn't beagle >> unmaintained? >> >> > > Last time I checked it had commit 36 h ago although it has no big > changes in git. Anyway it seems much more stable for me (i.e. does > not block my desktop). > > Regards Hi Maciej if I got it right, tracker would mainly be integrated in GNOME as a central RDF store, more than a desktop indexer... I don't know if Beagle provides this functionnality. Cheers Adrien > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > _______________________________________________ > tracker-list mailing list tracker-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkqOxiwACgkQ8r/KOkHzAnF6cACeLjN4gBAdanoYYbeWT7xcpVtV Ty4An1ru43LZn77E1Ez+tdZqU5vvihYH =4JKH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |