Re: [Tracker] New module proposal: tracker



On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:24 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 18:16 +0200, Maciej Piechotka wrote:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,

So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core 
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module 
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/tracker-list/2009-August/msg00007.html

The response was positive. So I would like to propose Tracker as a new 
GNOME module.

Right now Tracker 0.7 is currently in development and we are hoping to 
get the 0.7. unstable release out the door in the coming month or so.

Right now we are considering making the miners (the file system crawling 
at this point) optional so it acts purely as a store if needed by ISVs. 
This is not yet done in master but can be if that's a GNOME requirement.

Dependencies include:

   libxml >= 0.6
   libpng >= 1.2
   libuuid
   zlib
   dbus >= 0.60
   sqlite3 >= 3.5 (built with --enable-load-extension)
   hal >= 0.5
   vala >= 0.7.3
   pango >= 1.0.0

Beyond that, the rest of the requirements affect your extraction 
ability. For example, if poppler-glib is on the platform, you can then 
extract PDF files. This also depends on if streamanalyser is used or not 
(which does all extraction for us and negates the needs for specific 
libraries in Tracker).

Dependencies about to be dropped but still needed:

   gmime
   lex
   yacc
   libraptor

The git repository is here:

http://git.gnome.org/cgit/tracker/

We import the following libraries:

   libinotify
   rasqal

Licensing wise, those libinotify and rasqal both share the LGPL, as does 
libtracker. The rest is GPLv2 or later.

/discuss ;)


Well. Currently there are two projects which, at least for the first
sight, are similar - Tracker and Beagle. So the first question is why
should Gnome include Tracker and not Beagle?

I might be wrong and things might have changed, but isn't beagle
unmaintained?



Last time I checked it had commit 36 h ago although it has no big
changes in git. Anyway it seems much more stable for me (i.e. does not
block my desktop).

Regards

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]