Re: [Tracker] Fwd: GNOME module proposal?

[Jamie McCracken <jamie mccrack googlemail com>]

On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 08:52 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
> On 13/08/09 08:30, Ivan Frade wrote:
> > Sorry, i pressed "Reply" instead of "Reply all"
>
> :)
>
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Ivan Frade<ivan frade gmail com>
> > Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:27:03 +0300
> > Subject: Re: [Tracker] GNOME module proposal?
> > To: Martyn Russell<martyn lanedo com>
> >
> > an enthusiastic +1 for the gnome module proposal. 6 months release is
> > a good baseline (we should release more often, anyway).
>
> I agree.

me 2 although we need a few weeks to do a release then propose

> > practicalities:
> >
> > * should we propose everything or only the store? i would propose
> > everything (store + miner-fs) and wait for the feedback.
>
> Everything.

yes

> Remember, ISVs will disable what they want anyway. We can even disable 
> things by default ourselves. But I don't think tracker-store on its own 
> makes sense at all. It is heavily dependent on applications then and we 
> need something (in the mean time at least) to show off what you can do 
> based on the content we find for users.
>
> > * the store is gpl, but under a dbus API, could the license be a problem?
>
> I don't think this is a problem. Someone correct me if I am wrong, but 
> we should be ok.

its not a problem so long as libtracker is lgpl (dbus access is x
license)

jamie