Re: [Tracker] Database access abstraction



Jamie McCracken wrote:
On Sat, 2008-11-01 at 01:11 +0000, Martyn Russell wrote:

These are just my thoughts after running over the API. I know your work
might consist mainly of what we already had, but this could be the
perfect opportunity to rename those functions to fit better to what they
actually do.

Great start JÃrg! Thanks for doing this.


have to agree - it looks very promising with better renaming

if we fully implemented this could we remove libtracker-db? (I would
assume it would be better combined with your stuff here)

I would definitely advise against this. We discussed this briefly
between us on IRC and thought it would be best to keep the abstraction
and actual database interaction APIs completely separate from the higher
level API which uses those DB APIs to access the data in a specific way.

-- 
Regards,
Martyn



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]