Re: [Tracker] track only postscript and pdfs?
- From: "Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen" <mikkel kamstrup gmail com>
- To: "Michael Biebl" <mbiebl gmail com>
- Cc: tracker-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Tracker] track only postscript and pdfs?
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:44:21 +0200
On 16/04/2008,
Michael Biebl <
mbiebl gmail com> wrote:
2008/4/15, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <mikkel kamstrup gmail com>:
> On 15/04/2008, Michael Biebl <mbiebl gmail com> wrote:
> > 008/4/11, Parker Jones <zoubidoo hotmail com>:
> >
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to use tracker to monitor only pdf's and postscript files. Is
> this possible?
> > >
> > > At the moment, I ignore a number of extensions *.doc *.html *.png etc,
> but the ignore list is getting too long and still too many files are
> getting tracked.
> >
> >
> > I think this should be doable:
> > We should not only have a blacklist of file extenstions, but also a
> whitelist.
> > Then add * in the blacklist and *.pdf and *.ps to the whitelist. The
> > whitelist should have a higher priority then the blacklist. I'd say
> > (without looking at the code), that this could be fixed easily.
>
> Or go old-school and just make a list of regexps..? Then one could simply
> write a not-pdf-or-ps blacklist regexp.
>
Would be an option. But do you think this would be intuitive for the
average user?
Was that a rhetorical question? Heck, no! I bet that less than 0.1% of the Tracker users know regexps :-)
Anyways, Beagle does in fact seem to support it. Or maybe it is just globbing.
Cheers,
Mikkel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]