Re: [Tracker] r1015 impressions

["Tshepang Lekhonkhobe" <tshepang gmail com>]

On Nov 13, 2007 5:44 PM, jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 15:41 +0000, jamie wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 17:31 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > > On Nov 13, 2007 5:11 PM, jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:59 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Using Core2 Duo 1.5GHz, I checked out r1015 db reliability and performance by:
> > > > >
> > > > > * indexing Linux src (< 14 minutes + 38MB RAM usage),
> > > > > * renaming the top-level directory (< 2 minutes to finish the move operation),
> > > > > * deleting that src (<2 minutes),
> > > > > * [TROUBLE] putting back that src on original path, the contents did
> > > > > not become fully indexed, except when I restarted trackerd
> > > > >
> > > > > Note: with additional punishment, trackerd manages to reach 45MB RAM usage.
> > > >
> > > > when you say putting back the original path do you mean moving/renaming?
> > >
> > > I put it (Linux source) back on WatchDirectoryRoots (the same I had
> > > deleted before).
> > >
> > > > Can you give me some reproducible steps please
> > >
> > > I don't understand. What's missing from my description?
> >
> >
> > changing WatchDirectoryRoots needs a restart anyhow to take effect so Im
> > not sure its a bug
>
> or do you mean you copied the linux src to an existing directory which
> was being watched?
>
> jamie

Sorry if it was not that clear. That's what I meant.

-- 
my place on the web:
floss-and-misc.blogspot.com