Re: [Tracker] r1015 impressions

On Nov 13, 2007 5:11 PM, jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 16:59 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:

Using Core2 Duo 1.5GHz, I checked out r1015 db reliability and performance by:

* indexing Linux src (< 14 minutes + 38MB RAM usage),
* renaming the top-level directory (< 2 minutes to finish the move operation),
* deleting that src (<2 minutes),
* [TROUBLE] putting back that src on original path, the contents did
not become fully indexed, except when I restarted trackerd

Note: with additional punishment, trackerd manages to reach 45MB RAM usage.

when you say putting back the original path do you mean moving/renaming?

I put it (Linux source) back on WatchDirectoryRoots (the same I had
deleted before).

Can you give me some reproducible steps please

I don't understand. What's missing from my description?

my place on the web:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]