John Stowers wrote:
I just wanted to mention that I recently participated in the discussion for the new Compiz website. In that discussion may people suggested a CMS to solve a whole heap of problems, but could offer no substantial justification why it was needed, or in the Compiz case, what problems a CMS solved that could not be solved with a wiki. I can understand if one of the benefits is "easy to skin", but I dont think things like "easy to edit, collaborative, etc" are all that revolutionary. I think those with web developer ability should concentrate on making the current tracker page attractive, and putting the rapidly changing information on the GNOME wiki.
I don't think so. Tracker is Desktop Agnostic, so why GNOME? What I mean is that, with a wiki maybe, we can have the "static website" and also the possibility to have a wiki with all the changing information on one place, instead of several ones. But right now the wiki is not really heavy used.... All the features are in heavy development and when they become stable they are added to the uffcial website... We have to see what is going to happen and which are our requirements.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature