Re: [Tracker] trackerd consuming "too much" memory

[jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>]

On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:50 +0100, Fabrizio Listello wrote:
> Hi all on the list,
> I'm using Tracker version 0.6.3 on my Gentoo GNU/Linux laptop and I'm
> seeing a weird amount of memory consumed by the tracker daemon.
> As one of the objectives of tracker is the "small footprint" I think
> we should examine the problem. 
> Here is a couple of rows taken from 'top', ordered by %MEM:
>
> top - 14:37:23 up  5:02,  4 users,  load average: 1.52, 1.66, 1.57
> Tasks: 119 total,   2 running, 117 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
> Cpu(s):  2.8%us, 12.5%sy, 47.2%ni,  0.0%id, 37.5%wa,  0.0%hi,  0.0%si,
> 0.0%st
> Mem:   1002440k total,   988740k used,    13700k free,    15728k
> buffers
> Swap:   337356k total,   214728k used,   122628k free,   188932k
> cached 
>
>   PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+
> COMMAND                          
> 11980 user0001 34  19  419m 294m 3540 S  0.0 30.1   1:09.13
> trackerd                         
>  9217 user0001  15   0  307m 142m  23m R  0.0 14.5  18:00.48
> firefox-bin                      
>  7724 root      15   0  296m  72m 7852 S  1.4  7.4  29:14.53
> X                                
>  4569 user0001  15   0  414m  67m  43m S  0.0  6.9   0:07.92
> soffice.bin                       
>  1134 user0001  15   0  178m  57m  22m S  0.0  5.9   1:15.53
> thunderbird-bin                  
>  8880 user0001  39  19  106m  31m 9896 S  0.0  3.2   9:15.90
> beagled-helper                   
>  5642 beaglein  39  19 67700  29m 8128 D 59.7  3.1   8:21.90
> beagle-build-in 
>
> As you can see both VIRT and RES are very very high, for example they
> are higher than program well-known for their "excessive" use of
> memory. (..and much worse... it's higher than the indexer-cousin
> shaved-dog :) 

 mem leaks have been fixed already in svn

I assume you are using 0.6.3 which has this problem?

jamie