Re: [Tracker] [PATCH] Moving towards internal metadata extractors

["Samuel Cormier-Iijima" <sciyoshi gmail com>]

On 9/27/06, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
> Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote:
> > On 9/26/06, Edward Duffy <eduffy gmail com> wrote:
> >> Update to that last patch with exif enabled.
> >>
> >> On 9/26/06, Edward Duffy <eduffy gmail com> wrote:
> >> > Here's the patch for moving everything to tracker-extract.
> >> >
> >> > On 9/26/06, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
> >> > > Edward Duffy wrote:
> >> > > > Is there any advantage to keeping them internal?  Should we just
> >> stick
> >> > > > with tracker-extract for all types?
> >> > >
> >
> >
> > ...
> > I just reindexed all my files with an up-to-date CVS tracker, and the
> > CPU usage skyrocketed to 90%. Is this possibly because all the
> > extracting is done in tracker itself, so we lose things like nice -19?
>
> trackerd runs at nice +10
>
> only text filters run at nice +19

That's weird.. then how come it was hogging so much CPU? (I have about
200 GB of stuff, but the last time I indexed usage didn't go above 10%
or so)

> --
> Mr Jamie McCracken
> http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/