Re: [Tracker] Tracker to do list



By the way, I just saw that the included libextractor is quite out of
date... are there any plans to sync with latest version (0.5.15)?

On 9/7/06, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote:
> As classes have started and I'm getting back into routine, I'll
> (ironically) have more time for hacking :-) and I'll see what I can
> do. Maybe help with the documentation and the website... BTW, I can't
> wait for the DOS port :-).
>

great!

> Also, I'm thinking about modifying QuodLibet to use tracker to search
> for songs. I'm not sure   if it's a good idea, but it seems like it
> would be WAY faster than its current pickling/unpickling of python
> objects :-). Would this be the "right way" to do things? What if
> applications just tagged objects as belonging to them? hmm, the
> possibilities ;-) oh well, let me know if any of you are interested,
> and/or what I can do to help you out.

Well tarcker is being designed as a common music database so yes it
should be suitable to use it for any of that.

I believe Sri is working on a tracker plug-in for Rhythmbox

--
Mr Jamie McCracken
http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]