Re: [Tracker] Release this weekend and general update



Nope..just like the mplayer-based extractor, if its there it'll get
used, if it's not, it keeps going.  My patch does not make mplayer a
hard dependancy, and neither would this.

On 10/16/06, Erlend Davidson <E R M Davidson sms ed ac uk> wrote:


Jedy Wang wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 11:38 +1300, John Stowers wrote:
>
>>>> 3. mplayer based extractor for videos and audio.
>>>>
>>> A dependency to mplayer is not acceptable IMHO. On some distribution of
>>> linux, I wonder whether it will be shipped one day!
>>> Debian still has problem with some legal things in it...
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use GStreamer directly for instance?
>>>
>> Some of you might have seen this, but recently a standalone totem
>> based video and audio metadata extractor was committed to totem HEAD.
>>
>> News: http://www.hadess.net/
>> Info: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361047
>> Code: http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/totem/src/totem-video-indexer.c?view=markup
>>
>> Because totem is heading to be more gstreamer based, would a totem
>> based video/audio indexer be acceptable?
>>
> I think it's useful. Some distributions can not use mplayer because of
> license problem.
>
Does this make tracker depend on Totem?  Totem depends on quite a few
gnome-only packages, which is hardly ideal for a desktop-agnostic
standard.  What about taglib / id3lib?
>> John
>> _______________________________________________
>> tracker-list mailing list
>> tracker-list gnome org
>> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tracker-list mailing list
> tracker-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list
>
_______________________________________________
tracker-list mailing list
tracker-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tracker-list




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]