Re: [Tracker] text search is implicitly always OR



Marcus Fritzsch wrote:
On 7/26/06, Jamie McCracken <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk> wrote:
yes (although it wont be able to "or" stuff)

Yep, but if "+" is defaut, there should be a way to say "not +" ---
just translating a tracker-only-op to not having "+" in the sql query.


yes can-do!

I could have the prefix "~" to prevent the addition of a "+"

So to sum up it would be *and* by default and "~" must be prefixed to all terms to make it an *or*


--
Mr Jamie McCracken
http://jamiemcc.livejournal.com/




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]