Re: Patch: avoid crashes when there's no implementation of reconnection
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: Jose Dapena Paz <jdapena igalia com>
- Cc: tinymail-devel-list <tinymail-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Patch: avoid crashes when there's no implementation of reconnection
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:43:29 +0200
Approved
On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 12:02 +0200, Jose Dapena Paz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here goes the 4th patch from the work last week. It prevents a crash
> when CamelImapStore does not have a reconnecting operation. The question
> is, can this happen really? Or is the bug in any other place, and we
> should always get a valid reconnection operation?
>
> The commit is in svn r2479, the changelog:
>
> * libtinymail-camel/camel-lite/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-store.c:
> (camel_imap_recon): if there's no reconnection operation, then we don't
> call it, preventing crashes.
>
> _______________________________________________
> tinymail-devel-list mailing list
> tinymail-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymail-devel-list
--
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
http://www.pvanhoof.be/blog
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]