Re: Patch: avoid crashes when there's no implementation of reconnection


On Mon, 2007-07-23 at 12:02 +0200, Jose Dapena Paz wrote:
> 	Hi,
> 	Here goes the 4th patch from the work last week. It prevents a crash
> when CamelImapStore does not have a reconnecting operation. The question
> is, can this happen really? Or is the bug in any other place, and we
> should always get a valid reconnection operation?
> 	The commit is in svn r2479, the changelog:
> * libtinymail-camel/camel-lite/camel/providers/imap/camel-imap-store.c:
> (camel_imap_recon): if there's no reconnection operation, then we don't
> call it, preventing crashes.
> _______________________________________________
> tinymail-devel-list mailing list
> tinymail-devel-list gnome org
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]