Re: Packaging scripts for multiple distributions - possible solutions

[Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>]

Thanks a lot

On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 20:57 +0100, �stein Gisn�wrote:
> Done
> 
> 2007/1/30, Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>:
> > Go ahead
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 12:00 +0100, �stein Gisn�wrote:
> > > I've asked around for suggestions on how to solve the problem of
> > > keeping debian packaging scripts in-tree. The problem is to support
> > > Debian stable, testing, unstable, Ubuntu (many releases), Maemon, and
> > > so on.
> > >
> > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/thrd2.html#00767 for
> > > a thread with suggestions. To me, the control.maemo scheme sounds like
> > > a decent pragmatic approach. The problem would be if we had to modify
> > > many of the files. In that case, maybe debian/ should be pulled out
> > > and kept in its own tree which can be branched?
> > >
> > > I'll implement the control.maemo scheme one of the following days
> > > unless someone wants to do it before me.
> > >
> > > �stein
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tinymail-devel-list mailing list
> > > tinymail-devel-list gnome org
> > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymail-devel-list
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> tinymail-devel-list mailing list
> tinymail-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymail-devel-list
-- 
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be 
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org 
http://www.pvanhoof.be/blog