Re: Mime part viewers, support for PGP, ICS files and others
- From: Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>
- To: tinymail-devel-list gnome org
- Cc: me pczone be
- Subject: Re: Mime part viewers, support for PGP, ICS files and others
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 21:04:53 +0200
Also note that anybody can implement this. Knowing you guys can't wait
to do something cool for tinymail, Bart and Bjorn :-), feel free to
join.
It's just some OOP refactoring, and putting that in a little bit simple
GObject boilerplate code that can be 80% generated.
Or join on the thinking-side. Help me design/decide about it.
ps. Yah yah, we are all very busy. Same here. Not really a good
excuse ;). Sit back, relax. type some code. Join IRC. Tell me something
like: "I wrote code". Give it to me. I'll probably joinup that evening
and we'll be hacking the idea. It's as simple as that :)
On Tue, 2006-10-10 at 20:34 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm adding Chris Lord (Dates) and Nate Nielsen (Seahorse) to CC.
>
> I'm planning to quote design unquote the support for various mime-parts,
> in the tinymail framework, using a "MimePartView" type. This will be a
> type that plays a view in a MVC (model view controller) story. The model
> being the mime-part instance, the view being the new type. The
> controller being whatever component you'll put in between for both
> adapting the model and using it from the view.
>
> Examples of mime-part-views will be:
>
> o. a mime-part view that shows a normal mime-part being an attachment. A
> file attachment like a .txt or a .png file.
>
> o. a mime-part view that shows and deals with .ics files being calendar
> or todo items. The integration with softwares like Dates will happen via
> the implementation of this mime-part view.
>
> o. a mime-part view that shows and deals with PGP mime-parts being
> security keys. The integration with frameworks like Seahorse will happen
> via the implementation of this mime-part view.
>
> http://tinymail.org/trac/tinymail/wiki/HelpMimePartView
>
> An idea is to next to support for TnySaveStrategy in the TnyMsgView
> implementations, let the TnyMimePartView reuse the same strategy for in
> case you want to save a specific mime-part. Whereas the save strategy
> for the TnyMsgView will save the entire message.
>
> The entire message inherits from TnyMimePart, so that's why it can also
> be used as a mime-part by itself, and why the TnyMsgView needs support
> for the TnySaveStrategy.
>
> Another idea is to rename TnySaveStrategy to TnyMimePartSaveStrategy and
> let it handle both saving a TnyMsg (which inherits TnyMimePart) and a
> TnyMimePart.
>
>
> SO
>
> This means that
>
> o. Viewing (and handling) a mime-part is supported if an implementation
> for it is registered to the message-viewer
>
> o. Saving a mime-part is supported via a save strategy that is reused
> between all components that know that they 'can' save a mime-part of
> whatever they are viewing (a message view and a mime-part view)
>
> o. Viewing is an abstract concept. It can mean "handling the mime-part"
> for integrating with other softwares.
>
> FOR example. One such viewer could have a simple button with the text
> "register this calendar item with Dates". Pressing that button would use
> the libecal API to store the ".ics" attachment in eds, and Dates would
> then be notified to update it's own view.
>
> Another such viewer might actually show the ".ics" file in a "Dates
> widget". This is up to the implementer of the mime-part viewer.
>
> Another example will be a PGP mime-part. The action to handle (viewing
> it) the PGP mime-part might simply be asking Seahorse whether or not the
> PGP key is a valid one. And if not, Seahorse would probably return
> something bad so that the view can show a red label telling the user
> that no, the key is not okay. Or a green label telling the user yes, the
> key is okay.
>
> And in future when whatever-company invents whatever-new mime-part which
> they start attaching to E-mails, a whatever-new mime-part viewer can be
> implemented and attached (as a plugin) to all the existing message view
> implementations.
>
>
>
>
> Right ... so, I'm interested in opinions, suggestions, etc etc
>
>
--
Philip Van Hoof, software developer at x-tend
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
work: vanhoof at x-tend dot be
http://www.pvanhoof.be - http://www.x-tend.be
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]