Re: Unit tests with check framework
- From: "Øystein Gisnås" <oystein gisnas net>
- To: tinymail-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Unit tests with check framework
- Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 13:57:15 +0100
I can replace it all over as soon as I get the go (which you just
did). It's a fairly simple to replace everything and drop GUnit.
Looking at further opportunities, test coverage comes up. I had a look
at GStreamers solution to this. They have a neat generated view
http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/coverage/lcov/gstreamer/. The
make scripts for this clutter up a bit, so we have to decide for
including that or not.
2006/12/7, Philip Van Hoof <spam pvanhoof be>:
That's very nice.
Once all the current unit tests are replaced like this, feel free to
commit the patch.
Or you can create a branch and work with other people on this? I would
only see the point of a branch of multiple people are interested,
however, in working on this.
ps. You don't need to keep the compatibility with GUnit. It's not a
priority.
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:14 +0100, Øystein Gisnås wrote:
> Philip earlier expressed his interest in using the Check unit test
> framework instead of GUnit. I've played around with it a bit and found
> that it has a few improvements over GUnit. The biggest surprise was
> that it can run in parallel with GUnit, although that is probably not
> a long-term solution.
>
> So if you want to try it out, apply the patch. I've only "converted"
> three test files, but you'll get the picture..
>
> Any opinions on whether GUnit should be replaced by Check? Philip, anyone?
>
> Do make 'check' in libtinymail-test to run the tests.
> _______________________________________________
> tinymail-devel-list mailing list
> tinymail-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/tinymail-devel-list
--
Philip Van Hoof, software developer
home: me at pvanhoof dot be
gnome: pvanhoof at gnome dot org
blog: http://pvanhoof.be/blog
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]